BUFFSEEK R01 vs Yozma IN10: Which Electric Dirt Bike Is Right for You?
Share
The BUFFSEEK R01 and Yozma IN10 occupy a very similar part of the electric dirt bike market.
Both use:
- 48V battery systems;
- 14-inch front and 12-inch rear wheels;
- Compact off-road chassis;
- Chain drivetrains;
- Hydraulic braking systems;
- Recreational off-road positioning;
- Pricing around the $1,000 range.
That makes them natural alternatives for riders comparing compact electric dirt bikes for recreational riding, teens, beginners, and smaller adult riders.
But the specifications are not identical.
The R01 emphasizes a 3500W peak mid-drive system, greater ground clearance, and a slightly taller riding position, while the Yozma IN10 emphasizes lower weight, lower seat height, faster listed charging, and a higher advertised maximum range.
This comparison looks at the differences without assuming that one specification automatically makes one bike better for every rider.
Quick Comparison: BUFFSEEK R01 vs Yozma IN10
| Specification | BUFFSEEK R01 | Yozma IN10 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Listed Price | $1,099 | $1,099 |
| Rated Motor Power | 1500W | Not separately listed |
| Peak Motor Power | 3500W | 2600W |
| Peak Torque | Up to 146 N·m | 146 N·m |
| Battery | 48V 23Ah | 48V 23.4Ah |
| Nominal Battery Energy | Approx. 1,104Wh | Approx. 1,123Wh |
| Advertised Top Speed | Up to 37 mph | Up to 40 mph |
| Advertised Range | Up to 37 miles | Up to 53 miles |
| Seat Height | 31.5 in | 28 in |
| Wheels | 14" / 12" | 14" / 12" |
| Bike Weight | Approx. 132 lb | 121 lb |
| Maximum Load | Approx. 265 lb | 265 lb |
| Ground Clearance | 13.4 in | 9 in |
| Charging Time | Approx. 7–8 hours | Approx. 5–6 hours |
| Drive System | Mid-drive / Chain | Chain Drive |
| Intended Use | Recreational / Light Off-Road | Off-Road |
Yozma's specifications and current $1,099 listed price are taken from its official IN10 product page. Yozma also notes that range and speed can vary based on rider weight, terrain, and weather.
Pricing and product specifications can change, so buyers should confirm the latest information on each manufacturer's product page before purchasing.
Motor Power: 3500W Peak vs 2600W Peak
One of the clearest differences is the advertised motor output.
The BUFFSEEK R01 uses:
1500W rated / 3500W peak mid-drive motor
The Yozma IN10 lists:
2600W peak brushless motor
Yozma does not separately publish a continuous or rated motor-power figure in the specification section currently available on its official product page.
That distinction matters.
Peak motor power represents short-duration maximum output, while rated power is generally more useful when thinking about sustained riding.
On paper, the R01 has the higher stated peak-power figure.
However, buyers should not compare electric dirt bikes by watts alone.
Actual performance also depends on:
- Controller tuning;
- Gearing;
- Motor design;
- Total weight;
- Wheel size;
- Battery output;
- Terrain.
For a deeper explanation, see our Electric Dirt Bike Motor Power Guide.
Torque: Both List 146 N·m
Interestingly, both bikes advertise up to 146 N·m of torque.
Yozma currently lists 146 N·m for the IN10, while the R01 uses the same advertised peak-torque figure.
Torque is especially relevant during:
- Acceleration;
- Hill climbing;
- Lower-speed off-road riding.
But torque specifications should still be interpreted alongside gearing and drivetrain design.
The same numerical torque figure does not necessarily mean two bikes will feel identical on the trail.
Battery: Almost the Same Capacity
Battery capacity is extremely close.
BUFFSEEK R01
48V 23Ah
Approximate nominal energy:
48 × 23 = 1,104Wh
Yozma IN10
48V 23.4Ah
Approximate nominal energy:
48 × 23.4 = 1,123.2Wh
Yozma therefore has only about 19Wh more nominal battery capacity, or roughly 1.7%.
In practical terms, these are very similar battery sizes.
That makes the difference in advertised range particularly interesting.
Range: 37 Miles vs 53 Miles
The R01 currently advertises:
Up to 37 miles
The Yozma IN10 advertises:
Up to 53 miles.
At first glance, that appears to be a large advantage for the IN10.
However, the batteries are almost identical in nominal energy capacity.
That means buyers should be careful not to assume that:
53 miles vs 37 miles
represents a directly comparable real-world test.
Range estimates can change significantly depending on:
- Test speed;
- Rider weight;
- Terrain;
- Riding mode;
- Tire pressure;
- Hills;
- Temperature.
Yozma itself notes that range and speed vary with rider weight, terrain, and weather conditions.
So the most accurate conclusion is:
Yozma publishes the higher maximum range claim, while the two bikes use batteries of almost identical nominal capacity.
Real-world side-by-side testing under identical conditions would be needed to establish the actual range difference.
This is an important distinction for a fair comparison.
Top Speed: 37 MPH vs 40 MPH
The difference in advertised maximum speed is relatively small.
R01
Up to 37 mph
IN10
Up to 40 mph.
A three-mile-per-hour difference on a specification sheet should not be the deciding factor for most recreational riders.
Actual maximum speed can change with:
- Rider weight;
- Battery charge;
- Terrain;
- Tire conditions;
- Temperature.
For light trails and recreational riding, braking, control, acceleration, and rider fit may be more important than a small difference in advertised top speed.
Seat Height: One of the Biggest Differences
This is where the two bikes become much easier to separate.
BUFFSEEK R01
31.5-inch seat height
Yozma IN10
28-inch seat height.
That is a substantial 3.5-inch difference.
The Yozma IN10 will therefore likely appeal more strongly to riders looking specifically for a lower riding position.
Yozma officially lists a suitable rider-height range of approximately:
3.94 ft to 5.9 ft.
The R01's 31.5-inch seat gives it a taller riding position while still remaining much more compact than many full-size motocross-style electric dirt bikes.
This means rider fit should play a major role in the decision.
Ground Clearance: 13.4 Inches vs 9 Inches
The opposite pattern appears with ground clearance.
R01
13.4 inches
IN10
9 inches.
That is approximately 4.4 inches more listed ground clearance for the R01.
Ground clearance matters when riding over:
- Rocks;
- Roots;
- Ruts;
- Uneven trails;
- Raised obstacles.
More clearance can reduce the likelihood of the lower chassis contacting terrain.
But there is a trade-off:
More ground clearance usually contributes to a taller bike.
So these two specifications fit together logically.
The IN10 emphasizes a lower seat.
The R01 provides a taller chassis with greater clearance underneath.
Which layout is more suitable depends on the rider and terrain.
Bike Weight: Yozma Is Lighter
Yozma lists the IN10 at:
121 lb
The R01 weighs approximately:
132 lb
That makes the IN10 roughly 11 lb lighter. Yozma's official specification also lists a 265 lb maximum load.
Lower weight can help with:
- Low-speed handling;
- Moving the bike manually;
- Loading and unloading;
- Picking the bike up after a fall.
This may be particularly relevant for smaller riders and beginners.
However, bike weight should always be considered alongside chassis dimensions and rider fit.
The lighter bike is not automatically the easier bike for every rider.
Wheel Size: Essentially the Same
Both bikes use:
14-inch front / 12-inch rear wheels
Yozma confirms this configuration in its geometry specifications.
That places both bikes firmly in the compact electric dirt bike / electric pit-bike-style category rather than full-size motocross geometry.
The 14"/12" configuration can help provide:
- Compact dimensions;
- Easier maneuverability;
- Lower overall chassis height;
- Recreational trail capability.
This is one of the reasons these two models make much more sense to compare with each other than with a large full-size electric motorcycle.
Overall Dimensions
Yozma lists the IN10 at approximately:
168 cm / 66.1 inches long
with a:
41.7-inch wheelbase.
The R01 is approximately:
63 inches long
with a compact recreational chassis.
So despite both using identical wheel sizes, the geometry is not exactly the same.
This reinforces why buyers should not compare only wheel diameter.
Seat height, wheelbase, overall length, and rider position all influence how a bike feels.
Charging Time: IN10 Is Faster on Paper
The R01 lists approximately:
7–8 hours
for a full charge.
Yozma lists:
5–6 hours from 0% to 100%
using a 48V 5A charger.
For riders who frequently need to recharge between riding sessions, the IN10's published charging specification is an advantage.
For riders who normally recharge overnight or between riding days, the difference may be less important.
Suspension and Brakes
Both bikes are equipped for recreational off-road riding.
Yozma lists:
- Hydraulic front suspension;
- Rear nitrogen shock absorber;
- Heavy-duty hydraulic brakes.
The R01 also uses front and rear suspension and hydraulic braking.
This means neither model is simply a small rigid mini bike.
Both are designed around a more substantial off-road chassis.
However, component specifications alone do not fully describe suspension quality or brake feel.
Real-world testing remains useful when comparing ride comfort and control.
Maximum Load
Both models are very close here.
The R01 supports approximately:
265 lb
Yozma lists:
265 lb / 120 kg.
Maximum load should not be confused with ideal rider size.
A rider may remain under the stated maximum load while still being physically too tall or cramped for the bike.
This is why seat height and overall geometry remain important even when load capacity looks suitable.
Which Bike Is Better for Shorter Riders?
Based purely on published dimensions, the Yozma IN10 offers the lower seat height:
28 inches vs 31.5 inches.
It is also approximately 11 lb lighter.
Those specifications may make the IN10 worth considering for riders who strongly prioritize:
- Lower seat height;
- Lower vehicle weight;
- Easier foot reach.
However, actual fit still depends on inseam, riding position, strength, and experience.
Which Bike Is Better for Rougher Recreational Terrain?
The R01 publishes substantially more ground clearance:
13.4 inches vs 9 inches.
It also lists a higher peak-motor-power figure:
3500W vs 2600W.
Those specifications may be relevant to buyers who place greater emphasis on:
- Clearance over uneven terrain;
- Power reserve;
- Recreational climbing;
- A slightly taller dirt-bike-style riding position.
That does not automatically mean the R01 will outperform the IN10 on every trail.
Traction, suspension behavior, rider technique, and surface conditions remain important.
Which Has the Better Battery?
From a capacity standpoint, they are almost identical.
R01
48V 23Ah ≈ 1,104Wh
IN10
48V 23.4Ah ≈ 1,123Wh
The IN10 has a very small nominal energy advantage.
Its official page also claims substantially more maximum range and faster charging.
However, because the stored-energy figures are so close, buyers should avoid comparing the two advertised range numbers as if they necessarily came from identical testing conditions.
For battery capacity alone, the difference is minimal.
Which Has More Motor Power?
On published peak specifications:
BUFFSEEK R01
3500W peak
Yozma IN10
2600W peak.
The R01 therefore carries the higher advertised peak-power figure.
It also publishes a 1500W rated output, while Yozma's current IN10 specification page does not separately list rated motor power.
That makes a complete sustained-power comparison difficult from the published specifications alone.
R01 vs IN10 for Beginners
Both manufacturers position these bikes toward approachable recreational riding.
Yozma describes the IN10 as intended for teens and adults and emphasizes beginner-friendly handling.
The R01 is also positioned toward beginners, teens, and smaller recreational riders.
For a beginner, I would focus less on the 2600W-vs-3500W headline and more on:
- Rider fit;
- Seat height;
- Bike weight;
- Throttle response;
- Riding modes;
- Braking;
- Terrain.
A shorter or lighter rider may appreciate the IN10's lower 28-inch seat and lower bike weight.
A rider who fits a 31.5-inch seat comfortably may prefer the R01's taller chassis and additional ground clearance.
R01 vs IN10 for Teen Riders
Teen riders vary too much for age alone to determine the right bike.
Compare:
- Height;
- Inseam;
- Strength;
- Experience;
- Bike weight;
- Seat height;
- Motor response.
Both bikes are powerful enough that protective equipment, appropriate supervision, and suitable off-road riding environments should be taken seriously.
The IN10's lower seat may make it physically accessible to some shorter riders.
The R01's taller platform may better suit riders who want more room and ground clearance while still staying within a compact 14"/12" wheel format.
For more information, see our Best Electric Dirt Bikes for Teens Guide.
Where the BUFFSEEK R01 Stands Out
The R01's most notable published differences are:
- 3500W peak mid-drive system;
- 1500W rated motor specification;
- 13.4-inch ground clearance;
- 31.5-inch seat height;
- Compact 14"/12" wheels;
- 48V 23Ah battery.
Rather than competing by being the lowest or lightest bike, the R01 sits toward the taller and more performance-focused end of this compact recreational category.
It remains much smaller than a traditional full-size motocross bike but provides more clearance and a higher peak-power specification than the IN10.
Where the Yozma IN10 Stands Out
Based on Yozma's currently published specifications, the IN10 stands out for:
- 28-inch seat height;
- 121 lb bike weight;
- Up to 40 mph advertised speed;
- Up to 53 miles advertised range;
- 5–6 hour listed charging time;
- 48V 23.4Ah battery.
It is particularly interesting for riders prioritizing a low seat and lighter chassis.
Which One Should You Choose?
The decision becomes easier if you start with your priorities.
Consider the BUFFSEEK R01 if you prioritize:
- Higher advertised peak motor power;
- More ground clearance;
- A taller compact dirt-bike riding position;
- Mid-drive power delivery;
- Recreational light off-road terrain.
Consider the Yozma IN10 if you prioritize:
- Lower seat height;
- Lower bike weight;
- Shorter published charging time;
- Higher manufacturer-advertised maximum range;
- A lower, more mini-bike-style chassis.
Neither specification set is universally better.
The correct bike depends mainly on rider fit and intended terrain.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the BUFFSEEK R01 more powerful than the Yozma IN10?
The R01 lists 3500W peak power, while Yozma lists 2600W peak for the IN10. However, actual riding performance also depends on controller tuning, gearing, motor design, bike weight, and terrain.
Which bike has the bigger battery?
They are almost the same.
The R01 uses 48V 23Ah, while the IN10 uses 48V 23.4Ah. Yozma's battery stores roughly 1.7% more nominal energy.
Which bike is lighter?
The IN10 is listed at 121 lb, while the R01 is approximately 132 lb.
Which has the lower seat?
The Yozma IN10. Its official seat height is 28 inches, compared with 31.5 inches for the R01.
Which has more ground clearance?
The R01 lists 13.4 inches of ground clearance, while Yozma lists 9 inches for the IN10.
Which charges faster?
Yozma publishes a 5–6 hour 0–100% charging time for the IN10. The R01 lists approximately 7–8 hours.
Why does Yozma claim 53 miles with a similar battery?
The two batteries have almost identical nominal energy capacity, but range claims depend strongly on test conditions. Yozma states that range varies with rider weight, terrain, and weather. Without standardized side-by-side testing, the advertised mileage figures should not be treated as directly equivalent test results.
Are the R01 and IN10 full-size electric dirt bikes?
No. Both use compact 14"/12" wheels and are better considered compact recreational electric dirt bikes rather than traditional full-size motocross platforms.
Final Comparison
The BUFFSEEK R01 and Yozma IN10 are unusually close competitors.
They cost roughly the same, use nearly identical battery capacity, share the same 14"/12" wheel format, and target similar recreational riders.
But their geometry and performance priorities differ.
The R01 offers:
More peak power + more ground clearance + taller compact geometry.
The IN10 offers:
Lower seat + lower weight + shorter published charging time + higher advertised maximum range.
For buyers comparing these two models, the most useful question is therefore not simply:
Which bike has the better specification sheet?
It is:
Do I want a lower and lighter compact bike, or a slightly taller compact bike with more ground clearance and a higher peak-power specification?
Once rider fit and intended terrain are clear, the choice becomes much easier.